Plagiarism Screening Policy

Resilient Civil Infrastructure Systems (RCIS) is committed to ensuring the originality and integrity of all published research.

All submitted manuscripts are subject to plagiarism screening prior to peer review.

 

1. Screening Procedure

Every submission undergoes similarity checking using recognized plagiarism detection software.

Screening is conducted:

  • Before peer review
  • Prior to final acceptance

The editorial office evaluates similarity reports to identify potential concerns.

 

2. Acceptable Similarity Threshold

As a general guideline:

  • Overall similarity should normally not exceed 20%
  • No single source should exceed 5%, excluding references

However, similarity percentage alone does not determine acceptability. Editorial assessment considers:

  • Context of similarity
  • Proper citation and quotation
  • Technical terminology overlap
  • Methodological descriptions

 

3. Types of Plagiarism Considered Misconduct

RCIS does not tolerate:

  • Direct copying without citation
  • Paraphrasing without attribution
  • Self-plagiarism without disclosure
  • Duplicate submission
  • Redundant publication
  • Data or image plagiarism

 

4. Actions in Case of Suspected Plagiarism

If plagiarism is detected:

Before Review

  • Manuscript may be returned for revision, or
  • Rejected outright in cases of serious misconduct

After Acceptance or Publication

  • Investigation will be conducted
  • Article may be corrected or retracted
  • Authors’ institutions may be notified

 

5. Self-Plagiarism Policy

Authors must disclose any prior related publications.

Reuse of previously published material must be:

  • Clearly cited
  • Substantially expanded
  • Scientifically justified

Redundant publication without disclosure is considered unethical.

 

6. Author Responsibility

By submitting a manuscript, authors confirm that:

  • The work is original
  • All sources are properly cited
  • The manuscript has not been published elsewhere

 

7. Editorial Discretion

The final decision regarding similarity concerns rests with the Editor-in-Chief.

Similarity screening supports, but does not replace, editorial judgment.